Beyond the Bangle: The other ornaments of the hand
Beyond the familiar bangle lies a rich tradition of hand jewellery. From the haathphool and the armlet to today's stacked rings, these ornaments reveal how symbols of royalty, warfare and marriage have evolved into everyday expressions of style
Ask someone to picture South Asian hand jewellery and the bangle arrives first, almost automatically — rows of glass or gold circling the wrist. But the bangle was never working alone. The hand and arm carried a whole cast of other ornaments, each with its own job to do, marking a bride, protecting a warrior, weighing down a dancer's sleeve just enough to catch the light.
Haathphool: Flowers for the hand
The haathphool or Ratanchur literally "hand flower" is less a single piece than an entire structure laid over the hand. A wrist bangle connects, via fine chains, to a ring on every finger except the thumbs, with an ornamental centrepiece sitting across the back of the hand like a small brooch. Worn correctly, it turns the whole hand into the jewellery, not just the wrist or the fingers.
Its lineage runs through Persia into the Mughal court, where it was picked up enthusiastically by Rajput nobility and, for a long stretch, remained the preserve of queens and women of rank before filtering down into general bridal wear across the Indian subcontinent.
Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel
Depending on the region and the goldsmith, it answers to several names haath kamal, hath panja, ratanchur or simply "hand chain" — and pearl versions are specifically associated with the Nawabi jewellery culture, while Kundan-set haathphools remain the more common bridal choice further west.
According to the owner and designer of 6 Yards Story Zerin Tasnim Khan, the overall character of jewellery across this subcontinent actually traces back to the Mughal era, which is why she considers it inaccurate to label the haathphool as exclusively Indian — its practice and prevalence have existed since the Mughal period, shared across the wider region rather than owned by one country.
Khan takes the argument further still. If the haathphool alone gets labelled Indian, she notes, then by the same logic almost any traditional ornament from this region would have to be called Indian too, the shitahar (necklace), mathar kuchu (head ornament), hasuli, and churi (bangles) all originate from the same Mughal period.
The partition of India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan has gradually introduced its own design differences since then, she said, but tracing any of these pieces back far enough leads to the same Mughal source — which is exactly why calling them "Indian" outright doesn't hold up.
What's interesting about the haathphool today is how far it has travelled from its original context. Once almost exclusively bridal, lighter, simplified versions sometimes just two or three finger-chains rather than the full eight-ring harness — now turn up as standalone party jewellery, worn with nothing else "traditional" in the outfit at all. It has, in effect, been promoted from a wedding-day requirement to a fashion decision.
In Bangladesh, the piece is often known by another name entirely — ratanchur — and its journey away from the wedding stage follows exactly this pattern, according to Khan, "There was a time when only brides used to wear the ratanchur — a piece of jewellery where five rings from five fingers connect to a bracelet via chains," she said.
Over time, the design evolved to become more minimal, transitioning from five fingers to just one finger or featuring only two chains. "Once the design became minimal, people realised that it was no longer limited to a gorgeous wedding look; rather, anyone could easily wear and carry it to any function or place.
Consequently, while no one wears the heavy version for regular use, the simple, single-finger ratanchur designs can be worn by anyone on a regular basis for any event." she explained.
The armlet: from battlefield to bridal wear
If any piece here has the most surprising backstory, it's the armlet — the bajuband. It did not start as women's jewellery at all. It began as part of a warrior's dress, worn in pairs by men going into battle alongside helmets and shields, a symbol of strength rather than beauty. Only gradually, as courtly and village fashions shifted, did it become primarily a woman's ornament, generally worn as a single piece rather than the paired set men once wore.
From there it split into two distinct regional identities. North kept the armlet close to its original rope-like shape — a stone-set band worn on the bicep, historically also used by dancers, partly to protect the upper arm from friction during vigorous movement. South reshaped it entirely into a semi-V silhouette, with its more elaborate modern forms understood as descendants of ancient designs.
Both the armlet and the bangle belong to the wedding ornaments, the traditional adornments of a bride, and both carry the same folk belief attached to most jewellery worn at a pulse point that it wards off the evil eye.
Today, real gold-and-diamond armlets have mostly retreated to weddings and major occasions, but the piece has a steady second life on festive wear.
What connects them
Set side by side, the haathphool, the armlet, and the modern ring stack tell a fairly consistent story. Each began attached to a specific, non-negotiable context — a royal court, a battlefield, a wedding day — and each has since been unbundled from that context, kept for its shape and its craft rather than the occasion it was built for.
The haathphool no longer needs a wedding. The armlet no longer needs a war, or even necessarily a bride. It has become the most personal and least rule-bound piece of jewellery a hand can wear.
That split is exactly where haathphool, armlet, designers working in Dhaka sit right now: caught between clients who still want the full, correct, occasion-bound version of a piece, and a newer customer who wants the same shape reinterpreted as something she can wear on an ordinary Tuesday. It is worth asking any designer here directly which side of that line their own order book is actually leaning toward. The answer tends to say more about where the craft is heading than any single trend report can.
The bangle may still be the first thing that comes to mind. But increasingly, it's these other pieces quieter, more flexible, less tied to a single life event that are doing the more interesting work.
