The anatomy of an uprising: When protest topples power, and when it fails
Uprisings can force presidents into exile, bring down dictatorships or leave authoritarian systems more entrenched than before. What determines whether the street succeeds has depended on far more than courage alone
The United States Declaration of Independence gives popular resistance one of its clearest political formulations. When the government becomes destructive of the ends for which it exists, it says, "It is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it". The proposition is simple: political authority ultimately rests on the consent of the governed.
History complicates that promise. Governments rarely recognise this right when citizens attempt to exercise it. Demands for accountable rule have repeatedly been answered with bullets, torture, disappearances, mass detentions, and communications blackouts.
Some movements removed rulers with remarkably little loss of life; others succeeded only after hundreds or thousands had been killed. Still others failed, but changed the political consciousness of their nations.
Keep updated, follow The Business Standard's Google news channel
From military rule to democratic openings
Pakistan, 1968–69. Ayub Khan's "Decade of Development" ended in a movement begun by students and strengthened by workers, peasants, professionals and opposition parties across both wings of Pakistan. Police killed students, made mass arrests and fired on demonstrations; exact nationwide fatalities remain disputed.
Ayub resigned in March 1969, but the victory was incomplete: power passed to General Yahya Khan, another military ruler, even as the movement cleared the way for Pakistan's first general election.
Two years after Ayub's fall, Pakistan's refusal to transfer power after the Awami League won the 1970 election transformed a mass non-cooperation movement into a war of independence. On 25 March 1971, the Pakistan Army launched Operation Searchlight, targeting students, political activists, intellectuals, Hindus and other civilians.
During the nine-month war, Pakistani forces and their local auxiliaries carried out mass killings and systematic sexual violence. Bangladesh's official claims put the death toll at three million, while 200,000–400,000 women and girls have been raped; around 10 million people fled to India.
After resistance by the Mukti Bahini, Pakistani forces surrendered on 16 December, creating independent Bangladesh at catastrophic human cost.
Fifteen years later, the Philippines demonstrated that the decisive final confrontation did not always have to become a massacre. The People Power Revolution of 1986 followed years of dictatorship, the assassination of opposition leader Benigno Aquino Jr and a fraud-tainted election claimed by Ferdinand Marcos.
More than two million civilians gathered along Manila's EDSA highway, protected military defectors and faced tanks. The four-day uprising was overwhelmingly peaceful. Yet the regime it ended had detained about 70,000 people, tortured more than 34,000 and executed over 3,000 during the martial-law era. Marcos fled and Corazon Aquino became president.
The Philippines' peaceful denouement contrasts with Bangladesh's anti-Ershad uprising of 1990, where police firing, emergency rule and arrests accompanied the final pressure on General HM Ershad.
The killings of Noor Hossain in 1987 and Dr Shamsul Alam Khan Milon in 1990 became symbols of resistance; contemporary reporting recorded at least nine deaths during the final emergency period, while some later accounts give higher totals. Ershad resigned on 6 December; an interim administration organised the 1991 election and parliamentary government returned.
If Bangladesh's transition was violent but relatively contained, Indonesia's Reformasi movement of 1998 showed how economic collapse could turn protest into urban catastrophe. Security forces shot dead four Trisakti University students on 12 May.
The killings helped ignite riots in which more than 1,000 people died, many in burning buildings; ethnic Chinese communities were targeted, and women reported widespread sexual violence. Students occupied parliament, elites abandoned Suharto, and he resigned on 21 May after 32 years in power.
The Arab Spring and its divergent revolutions
Tunisia, 2010–11. Mohamed Bouazizi's self-immolation after official harassment transformed local anger over unemployment, corruption and police abuse into a national revolt. Security forces used live ammunition and carried out sweeping arrests; an independent commission counted 338 deaths, including prisoners and security personnel.
President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali fled on 14 January 2011. Tunisia then held competitive elections and adopted a democratic constitution, although later presidential concentration of power demonstrated how revolutionary gains could be reversed.
Tunisia's ruler fled after hundreds had died; Egypt's 25 January Revolution of 2011 required an even higher price. During 18 days centred on Tahrir Square, security forces, armed government supporters and detention authorities used gunfire, beatings and torture.
At least 840 people were killed, about 6,500 injured and thousands detained. Hosni Mubarak resigned on 11 February. Yet the military managed the transition, an elected president was removed in 2013, and a harder authoritarian order emerged.
In Libya, repression did not merely increase the death toll; it changed the nature of the uprising. Protests against Muammar Gaddafi's 42-year rule began in Benghazi in February 2011. More than 100 people were reportedly killed within the first four days, while later estimates placed civilian deaths during the initial crackdown at several hundred.
The movement rapidly became an armed rebellion, civil war and internationalised conflict involving NATO air power. Gaddafi's government collapsed, and he was killed, but Libya's state fragmented.
Ukraine's Euromaidan, 2013–14, returned the struggle to occupied squares, though not to non-violence. It began after President Viktor Yanukovych abandoned an association agreement with the European Union. Police beat students, drawing a much broader movement against corruption and arbitrary rule.
The confrontation culminated in sniper fire and street battles. The United Nations documented the violent deaths of 83 protesters, a journalist, a bystander and 13 law-enforcement officers. Yanukovych fled, but the revolution was followed by Russia's seizure of Crimea and war in eastern Ukraine.
Ukraine's government fell amid bloodshed. South Korea's Candlelight Revolution of 2016–17 shows the opposite model: sustained mass pressure without a mass-fatality crackdown. Revelations that President Park Geun-hye had allowed confidante Choi Soon-sil extraordinary influence over state affairs brought millions into peaceful weekend demonstrations.
Parliament impeached Park, and the Constitutional Court unanimously removed her. Constitutional institutions, rather than armed confrontation, completed the work begun in the streets.
That restraint was absent in Sudan's revolution of 2018–19. Demonstrations over bread prices became a nationwide demand to end Omar al-Bashir's 30-year rule. Security forces fired on crowds, raided hospitals and detained or tortured activists. The army removed Bashir in April 2019, but protesters continued demanding civilian government.
On 3 June, the Rapid Support Forces and other security units attacked the Khartoum sit-in, killing more than 100 people; hundreds were injured, and rape and attacks on medical workers were reported. A power-sharing transition followed, only to be destroyed by a coup and civil war.
Movements that exposed the regime but could not replace it
Hong Kong, 2019–20. Opposition to an extradition bill became a mass defence of civil liberties and local autonomy. Police used tear gas, rubber bullets, water cannon and batons; Amnesty International documented arbitrary arrests and excessive or retaliatory violence, including treatment amounting to torture.
Student Chow Tsz-lok died after falling near clashes, but Hong Kong did not experience a mass killing. The bill was withdrawn, yet the wider movement lost when Beijing's national-security law dismantled organised opposition.
UN investigation found that as many as 1,400 people were killed between 1 July and 15 August, with children comprising 12–13%; more than 13,530 were injured, most by gunshots. Sheikh Hasina resigned and fled on 5 August.
Hong Kong demonstrated that a government could defeat a movement without mass slaughter. Belarus in 2020 showed a harsher method. After Alexander Lukashenko claimed another election victory, enormous crowds demanded an honest count and his departure.
Security forces detained thousands and systematically beat, humiliated and tortured detainees; the United Nations received hundreds of documented torture and ill-treatment allegations, and several deaths were linked to the crackdown. Lukashenko remained, while opposition leaders were imprisoned or driven abroad.
In Myanmar, repression crossed another threshold. The military coup of 1 February 2021 triggered demonstrations, strikes and a Civil Disobedience Movement involving doctors, teachers, railway workers and civil servants. Soldiers used gunfire and other battlefield methods against demonstrators.
The crackdown transformed parts of a peaceful movement into armed resistance and civil war. As of 23 July 2026, the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners had verified 8,200 civilians and pro-democracy activists killed by the junta and allied groups, while stressing that the actual total was probably higher.
South Asia's new protest cycle
Sri Lanka's Aragalaya, 2022, showed that even a ruler facing national economic collapse could flee with comparatively limited loss of life. Blackouts, shortages and inflation turned public anger into a rejection of the Rajapaksa dynasty.
Police killed one protester with live ammunition at Rambukkana; later violence between government supporters and protesters left nine dead and about 300 injured. After crowds occupied the presidential residence, Gotabaya Rajapaksa fled and resigned; Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa had already stepped down.
The contrast with Bangladesh's July–August 2024 uprising is stark. Both movements forced entrenched rulers to flee, but Bangladesh paid a vastly higher price. A campaign against public-service quotas became a national uprising after security forces and governing-party activists attacked students. Internet shutdowns, mass arrests, torture and extensive gunfire followed.
A UN investigation found that at least 1,400 people were killed between 1 July and 15 August, with children comprising 12–13%; more than 13,530 were injured, most by gunshots. Sheikh Hasina resigned and fled on 5 August.
Pakistan's PTI protests of 2024 produced neither that scale of killing nor regime change. Supporters protested Imran Khan's imprisonment, alleged election manipulation and the Shehbaz Sharif government, culminating in the November "Final Call" march on Islamabad. Authorities blocked roads, restricted communications and cleared the protest overnight.
Four paramilitary personnel were reported killed; PTI said two protesters were killed and 30 injured, claims Reuters could not independently verify. Thousands were arrested, and the government survived.
Nepal's Gen-Z uprising of 2025 was less deadly than Bangladesh's, but "lower" must not be mistaken for low. A social-media ban ignited wider anger over corruption, nepotism and unemployment.
On the first day, security forces fired live ammunition into crowds near parliament, killing at least 19 people. Across the protests and subsequent unrest, 76 people died, and more than 2,000 were injured. Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli resigned, the ban was lifted, and an interim government took office.
Nepal's toll was grave; Iran's economic and anti-regime uprising of 2025–26 may have been catastrophic. Protests beginning in late December over inflation and the collapsing rial spread across all 31 provinces and turned directly against clerical rule. Authorities imposed a near-total communications blackout and used firearms.
Because information was deliberately severed, casualty figures remain highly contested: a UK government evidence review cited estimates of 12,000–20,000 deaths, while one rights agency had confirmed 6,221 deaths and was investigating thousands more. The crackdown suppressed mass mobilisation and the Islamic Republic survived.
Against those enormous losses, India's "Cockroach" student movement of 2026 ended with a limited but tangible victory and no reported protest deaths. Anger over examination-paper leaks and failures in the national testing system brought tens of thousands into the streets. Clashes during a march towards parliament injured about 180 people.
Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned on 25 July, and the government announced examination reforms, but the Modi administration remained in office.
The right, and the price
These movements confirm the Declaration's proposition only in part. People can alter governments, but nothing guarantees success, peace or democracy. A ruler may flee after nine deaths, as in Sri Lanka, or after a crackdown killing as many as 1,400, as in Bangladesh. A prime minister may fall after 76 deaths, as in Nepal, while a regime may survive casualties measured in the thousands, as in Iran and Myanmar.
The decisive variable is not courage alone. Outcomes depend on whether security forces remain unified, whether governing elites defect, whether opposition groups can coordinate and whether institutions can translate street power into legitimate government. Protest can remove a ruler. Changing the state requires what comes after.
